elationship between art and society :: essays research papers fc

Relationship Between Art And Society MimesisThe relationship between art and society Mimesis as discussed in the works of Aristotle, Plato, Horace and Longinus The relationship between art and society in the works of Plato are based upon his idea of the domain of eternal Forms. He believed that there is a world of eternal, absolute and immutable Forms (the world of the Ideal) and thought that this is proven by when man is faced with the appearance of anything in the material world, his mind is moved to a remembrance of the Idea or an absolute and immutable version of the thing he sees. It is this moment of recollection that he wonders about the contrast between the world of shadows and the world of the Ideal. It is in this moment of wondering that man struggles to reach the world of Forms through the use of tenability. Anything then that does not serve reason is the enemy of man. Given this, it is only but logical that poem should be eradicated from society. Poetry shifts mans fo cus away from reason by presenting man with imitations of objects from the concrete world. Poetry, with its focus on mimesis or imitation, has no moral value. While Plato sees reality as a shadow of a res publica of pure Ideas (which in turn is copied by art), Aristotle sees reality as a process of partially realized forms moving towards their ideal realizations. Given this idea by Aristotle, the mimetic quality of art is redefined as the duplication of the living process of nature and its need to reach its potential form. Art then for Aristotle does not incur the enemy of society if the artist is loyal in the representation of the process of becoming in nature. Horace, like Aristotle and Plato, also brings to view a theory of poetry as mimesis. He believes that a poet should imitate real life and real manners in a similarly real language of the times. This is because of his belief of the brilliance of the audiences response to art. Horace focuses on the conventions that an artis t must fulfill so that the expectations of the audience may be met. The audience of that time was composed of twain the equites , who expected amusement from art, and the senatores , who expected beneficial lessons from art, and so the artist must know his craft and the conventions of his craft so that art may fulfill its last role in society which is both to create pleasure and to instruct.

Novel/Movie Difference Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay -- essays rese

In reading the book Mary Shelleys Frankenstein, and watching the by the same title, I discovered several large differences. Primarily, the edited and modified parts were changed to make the movie more interesting. In the book, Marry Shelley described everything in great detail. She included details that may not pertain to novels storyline directly, but more to the timeframe of the novel. When a movie comes out do after a specific novel, the screenplay eliminates most of these minute differences. For example, the letters in the beginning of the novel were depicted as high action scenes rather than in letter format.The introduction of the movie was my first difference listed. In the book, the captain of Frankensteins ship, R. Walton, wrote letters home to his sister about his voyage to the north pole. In the movie, it depicted these letters as action sequences happening in real time. A couple of in-depth differences in the introduction that jumped out were the big storm at the beginn ing and how the boat hits a bunch of Ice. Also they see Frankensteins monster in a dogsled.One very important difference was the absence of a background story for Elizabeth. In the movie, you have no idea where Elizabeth came from. She could have been born from a cow or something. She could have been released from purgatory to relive her emotional state in the midst of the Frankenstein family. The story of Frankensteins youth was trimmed back to a mere twenty minutes as opposed to one-third of th...

The Link Between Height and Personal Success :: Biology Essays Research Papers

The Link Between Height and Personal SuccessYour height wont cultivate what you earn as much as your race or gender, but it whitethorn well be significant. In Britain and America, the tallest quarter of the population earns 10% much than the shortest quarter. A white American man averages a 1.8% higher income than his counterpart an inch shorter (1). Economics is not the only ara in which taller people winnings out of the USs 42 presidents, only eight have been below average height for the time. Most have been significantly taller than the average for white adult males of their eras (2). long-shanked men be also more likely to be married and have children (3). Outside of normal height differences, people with growth deficiency are much more aware of the role height plays in their lives. A study done through a growth clinic showed that children with growth deficiency are more likely to have social problems. The problems included lower social competance, increased behavior proble ms, and low self-esteem. Another study found lower pass judgment of employment and marriage when children with growth deficiency grew up (4). One theory of why tall people are more successful is that there is fool attatched to height, and thusly short people are seen as easier to dominate (2). Another theory is that evolutionarily, tall people had an advantage in hunting and such and were thus associated with positive traits (5). Perhaps we still retain this association unconciously. The third theory is that taller people have a better-self image, and this increased confidence makes them more successful (2). A factor that may influence both earnings and height is ones family background. Shorter men tend to come from bigger families with parents who have less teaching than those of taller men. This shorter height may be a factor of poor childhood nutrition, and parents with less education are more likely to have children who also receive less education and therefore earn less. Fa mily background is not the only influence, though, as shorter men still earn less than taller men from the same background (2).Effects that protrude to stem from ones adult height, though, may have a different cause entirely. Participants in one study were asked to report their heights at ages 7,11, 16, and 23. The height that impact ones adult earnings, it turned out, was not the adult height but the 16-year-old height.